Купить СНПЧ А7 Архангельск, оперативня доставка

crosscheckdeposited

A Characterization of the Judicial System in Spain: Analysis with Formalism Indices

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v1n2p213-240

http://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/index 

downloadpdf

Juan S. Mora-Sanguinetti1

 

Resumen: El desarrollo de una economía de mercado necesita de un sistema judicial eficiente que garantice el cumplimiento de los contratos. La literatura destaca que el sistema judicial español sufre de un bajo rendimiento. Este trabajo proporciona, en primer lugar, un análisis del sistema judicial español y una medida de su grado de formalismo a la hora de juzgar conflictos civiles en el período 1966-2006. El grado de formalismo mide la complejidad de las formalidades necesarias para alcanzar el final de un proceso. Este trabajo analiza todos los tipos de procesos civiles disponibles, que en España dependen de la cuantía en disputa, y concluye que el grado de formalismo se ha reducido en los últimos años. La tasa de formalismo calculada es además diferente a aquélla de otros trabajos a nivel internacional. En segundo lugar, gracias a ese resultado, el trabajo proporciona una posible explicación a los grandes cambios en las tasas de resolución, pendencia y congestión del sistema de la última década.

Palabras clave: Eficiencia judicial, formalismo, ejecución de contratos, desarrollo económico.

 

Abstract: An efficient system of contract enforcement is an essential issue for the development of a market economy. Several surveys have drawn attention to the low performance of the Spanish judicial system. This paper provides an analysis and a measure of “procedural formalism” of the Spanish judicial system in the long run (1966-2006). Spain has a multiplicity of procedures for the same type of civil dispute depending on the amount in litigation. In this study, all those procedures are analyzed and it is suggested that formalism of the Spanish judicial system has diminished in the most recent years. These results help to explain the recent developments of the resolution, congestion and pending cases rates of the system and also contest the level of formalism assigned to Spain by previous works in the field.

Key words: Judicial efficiency, procedural formalism, contract enforcement, development.

 

1 I am grateful to the participants in the following fora: the IV annual Conference of the SIDE-ISLE (Università di Bologna) (2008), the Law Department seminar of Universitat Pompeu Fabra (2008) and the research seminar of the Master of Law and Economics of Universidad de Salamanca (2009). I am also grateful to Stefano Battilossi, Nuno Garoupa, Fernando Gómez Pomar, Philip Hill, Pilar Arróniz and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. Contact: juansmora@hotmail.com. The views expressed in this paper are entirely those of the author and should not be attributed to the Banco de España or the Eurosystem. Banco de España-Eurosystem

 

Literatura Citada

ACEMOGLU, D., JOHNSON, S. and J. A. ROBINSON (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. The American Economic Review 91 (5), pp. 1369-1401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369

ARRUÑADA, B. (2007). Pitfalls to avoid when measuring the institutional environment: Is ‘Doing Business’ damaging business? Journal of Comparative Economics 35, pp. 729-47.

BALAS, A., LA PORTA, R., LOPEZ DE SILANES, F. and A. SHLEIFER (2008). The divergence of legal procedures. NBER Working Paper No. W13809. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1091232

BARCELÓ, C. (2006). Housing tenure and labour mobility: A comparison across European countries. Banco de España Working Papers 0603.

BATRA, G., KAUFMANN, D. and A. STONE (2003). Voices of the firms: Investment climate and governance findings of the world business environment survey. World Bank, Washington, D. C.

CABRILLO, F. and S. PASTOR (2001). Reforma Judicial y Economía de Mercado. VII Premio Círculo de Empresarios, Círculo de Empresarios.

CABRILLO, F. and S. FITZPATRICK (2008). The Economics of Courts and Litigation. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781848442740

CÍRCULO DE EMPRESARIOS (2003). Justicia, Economía y Empresa. Madrid.

DESAI, M., GOMPERS, P. and J. LERNER (2005). Institutions, Capital Constraints and Entrepreneurial Firm Dynamics: Evidence from Europe. Harvard NOM Working Paper No. 03-59.

DJANKOV, S., MCLIESH, C. and R. M. RAMALHO (2006). Regulation and growth. Economics Letters, 92 (3) pp. 395-401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.021

DJANKOV, S., LA PORTA, R., LOPEZ DE SILANES, F. and A. SHLEIFER (2003). Courts. Quarterly Journal of Economics (118), pp. 453-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355303321675437

DOLADO, J. J., GONZÁLEZ-PÁRAMO, J. M. and VIÑALS, J. (1997). A cost-benefit analysis of going from low inflation to price stability in Spain. Banco de España Working Papers 9728.

FABBRI, D. and M. PADULA (2004). Does poor legal enforcement make households creditconstrained? Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(10), pp. 2369-2397.

GAROUPA, N., JORGENSEN, N. and P. VAZQUEZ (2008). Assessing the argument for specialized courts: evidence from family courts in Spain. FEDEA Documento de Trabajo 2008-16.

HARDMAN A. M., and Y. M. IOANNIDES (1999) Residential Mobility and the Housing Market in a Two-sector neoclassical growth model, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101, pp. 315-335.

HESTON, A., SUMMERS, R. and B. ATEN (2006), Penn World Table Version 6.2, Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, September 2006.

IGLESIAS, P. and X. C. ARIAS (2007). El sistema judicial español: una revisión de los principales problemas de la oferta y demanda de tutela judicial. Presupuesto y Gasto Público 47, pp. 137-160.

JAPPELLI, T., PAGANO, M. and M. BIANCO (2005). Courts and Banks: Effects of Judicial Enforcement on Credit Markets. Journal of Money Credit and Banking 37 (2), pp. 224-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2005.0021

JIMÉNEZ, C. and S. PASTOR (dirs) (2007). Aportaciones sobre la Justicia y la Empresa. Observatorio Justicia y Empresa. Aranzadi, Cizur Menor.

LA PORTA, R., LOPEZ DE SILANES, F. and A. SCHLEIFER (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy 106 (6), pp. 1113-1155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/250042

LA PORTA, R., LOPEZ DE SILANES, F., SCHLEIFER A. and W. VISHNY (1997). Legal determinants of external finance”. Journal of Finance LII (3), pp. 1131 – 1150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02727.x

MACLENNAN, D., MUELLBAUER, J. and M. STEPHENS (1998). Asymmetries in housing and financial market institutions and EMU. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14, pp. 54-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/14.3.54

MÉNARD C. and B. DU MARAIS (2006). Can we rank legal systems according to their efficiency? in New Frontiers of Law and Economics. Saint Gallen Schulthess.

MORA-SANGUINETTI, J. S. (2011). The regulation of residential tenancy markets in post-War Western Europe: An economic analysis. European Journal of Comparative Economics (forthcoming).

NORTH, D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University Press.

PADILLA, A. P. and A. REQUEJO (2000). The Costs and Benefits of the Strict Protection of Creditor Rights: Theory and Evidence. Inter-American Development Bank. Research Working Paper #R-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1814659

PADILLA, J., LLORENS, V., PEREIRAS, S. and N. WATSON (2007). Eficiencia judicial y eficiencia económica: el mercado crediticio español in La Administración Pública que España necesita. Libro Marrón. Círculo de Empresarios, Madrid.

RODRIK, D., A. SUBRAMANIAN and F. TREBBI (2004). Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development, Journal of Economic Growth 9 (2), pp. 131-165.