Купить СНПЧ А7 Архангельск, оперативня доставка

crosscheckdeposited

O Instituto da Responsabilidade e a Exploração de Petróleo em Águas Profundas

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v1n2p301-317

http://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/EALR/index 

downloadpdf

Ihering G. Alcoforado1, Rafael S. Rios2, Juliana F. de C. Guedes3 & Filipe N. S. S. de Menezes4

 

Resumo: Este trabalho discute novos condicionantes da gestão empresarial ambiental das atividades estabelecidas na fronteira da inovação científicotecnológica, com base no acidente da British Petroleum (2010). Aponta-se a lacuna institucional que incentivou a BP a distanciar-se e descuidar-se de obrigações legais relativas à responsabilidade civil, bem como novos elementos para o preenchimento desta lacuna. Por fim, chama-se atenção para outras possíveis estratégias de enfrentamento dos problemas institucionais e organizacionais a partir dos novos regimes de propriedade comum; de financiamento a pesquisas & desenvolvimento e das novas formas de organização da produção estabelecidas a partir dos conceitos extraídos da Techno-Economic Paradigms.

Palavras-chave: Incerteza, Responsabilidade, Fronteira Tecnológica.

 

Abstract: This paper discusses new constraints of corporate environmental management established on the frontier of scientific and technological innovation based on the British Petroleum accident (2010). The institutional gap that encouraged BP to adopt a pipeline of uncertainty, moving away and neglecting legal obligations related to liability is discussed, as well as the elements to fill this gap. Finally, will be called attention to other possible coping strategies of institutional and organizational problems as from the new common property regimes; for funding research & development and new forms of organization of production from the established concepts from the Techno- Economic Paradigms.

Key words: Uncertainty, Liability, Frontier Technology.

 

1 Faculdade de Ciências Econômicas –UFBA
2 Faculdade de Ciências Econômicas – UFBA
3 Escola Politécnica – UFBA
4 Instituto de Geociências – UFBA

 

Literatura Citada

Andersen, M. M. Combating Climate Change through Eco-innovation – Towards the green innovation system. In: Piana, V. (ed.). Innovative Economic Policies for Climate Change Mitigation. Economics Web Institute, 2010.

Ashfor, N. A. Reflections on Environmental Liability Schenes in the United States and European Union: Limitations and Prospects for Improvement. In: Conference on Environmental Liability, 2009, Piraeus, Greece.

Aven, T.; Viennem, J. E. On the use of risk acceptance criteria in the offshore oil and gas industry. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, v. 90, n. 1, p. 15-24, out, 2005.

Avi-Yonah, R. S., The Cyclical Transformations of the Corporate Form: A Historical Perspective on Corporate Social Responsibility. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, v. 30, n. 3, p. 767-818, 2005.

Beck, M.; Woolfson, C. The Hidden Deregulation of Britain's Offshore Oil Industry. CRIEFF Discussion Papers, n. 9511, 1995.

Beck, U. La sociedad del riesgo: hacia una nueva modernidad. Barcelona: Paidós, 2006.

Blankenburg, S., Plesch, D.,Wilkinson, F. Limited Liability and the Modern Corporation in Theory and in Practice. Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 34, p. 821-836, 2010.

Brasil. Secretaria Nacional de Defesa Civil. 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.defesacivil.gov.br/glossario/index1.asp >. Acesso em: 12 set 2009.

Bratton Jr., W. W. The New Economic Theory of the Firm: Critical Perspectives from History. Stanford Law Review, v. 41, n. 6, p. 1471-1527, jul, 1989.

Bromley, D. W.; Segerson, K. (eds.). The Social Response to Environmental Risk: Policy Formulation in an Age of Uncertainty. Boston: Kluwer, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2954-1

Brown Jr., G. M. Economics of Natural Resource Damage Assessment: A Critique. In: Kopp, R. J.; Smith, V. K. (eds.). Valuing natural assets: the economics of natural resource damage assessment resources for the future. Washington: Resources for the Future, 1993.

Calfee, J.; Winston, C. Economic Aspects of Liability Rules and Liability Insurance. In: Litan, R.; Winston, C. (eds.). Liability: perspectives and policy. Washington: The Brookings Institution Press, 1988.

Callon, M. The Dynamics of Techno-Economic Networks. In: Coombs, R., Saviotti, P., Walsh, V. (eds.). Technological Change and Company Strategies: Economic and Sociological Perspectives. London: Academic Press, 1992.

Carney, W. J. Limited Liability. 1999. Disponível em: <http://encyclo.findlaw.com/5620book.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 nov 2010.

Cheung, S. N. S. The Contractual Nature of the Firm. Journal of Law and Economics, v. 26, n. 1, p. 1-21, 1983.

Coase, R. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960.

Dosi, G. Technical Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technological Change. Research Policy, v. 22, p. 102-103, 1993.

Eastrebrook, F. H.; Fischel, D. R. The economic structure of corporate law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Enders, A.; Friehe, T. Generalized Progress of Abatement Technology: Incentives under Environmental Liability Law. German Working Papers in Law and Economics, paper 8, 2010.

Fragoso, H. C. Lições de Direito Penal. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 1985.

Freeman, C. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter, 1987.

Freeman, C. A Green Techno-Economic Paradigm for the World Economy. In: Freeman, C. The Economics of Hope: Essays on technical change, economic growth and the environment. London: Pinter, 1992.

Green, K., Hull, R., McMeekin, A.,Walsh, V. The Construction of the Techno-Economic: Networks vs. Paradigms. Research Policy, v. 28, p. 777-792, 1999.

Guningham, N.; Rees, J. Industry Self-Regulation: An Institutional Perspective. Law & Policy, v. 19, n. 4, p. 363-414, 1997.

Hansman, H.; Kraakman, R. Toward Unlimited Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts. The Yale Law Journal, 1991.

Harrington, S. E. Prices and Profits in the Liability Insurance Market. In: Litan, R. E.; Winston, C. (eds.). Liability: perspectives and policy. Washington: The Brookings Institution Press, 1988.

Heck, M. O Princípio da Precaução em Direito Internacional do Meio Ambiente. Boletim Científico, v. 2, n. 9, p. 113-138, 2003.

Hess, C.; Ostrom, E. Introduction: An Overview of the Knowledge Commons. In: Hess, C.; Ostrom, E. (eds.). Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. MIT Press, 2006.

Huber, P. Environmental Hazards and Liability Law. In: Litan, R. E.; Winston, C. (eds.). Liability: perspectives and policy. Washington: The Brookings Institution Press, 1988.

Kahan, D. R. Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts: A Historical Perspective. The Georgetown Law Journal, v. 97, p. 1085-1110, 2009.

Kelman, S. Cost-Benefit Analysis: An ethical critique. In: Glickman, T. S.; Gough, M. (eds.). Readings in Risk Resources. RFF PRESS, 1990.

Kenison, H. Uncertain Legal Issues. In: Kopp, R. J.; Smith, V. K. S. (eds.). Valuing natural assets: the economics of natural resource damage assessment resources for the future. Washington: Resources for the Future, 1993.

Knight, F. H. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Cosimo, 2006.

Kopp, R. J.; Smith, V. K. Understanding Damages to Natural Assets. In: Kopp, R. J.; Smith, V. K. S. (eds.). Valuing natural assets: the economics of natural resource damage assessment resources for the future. Washington: Resources for the Future, 1993.

Kwiatkowska, T. Beyond Uncertainties: Some Open Questions about Chaos and Ethics. Ethics & the Environment, v.6, n. 1, p. 96-115, 2001.

Leite, J. Dano Ambiental: do Individual ao Coletivo Extrapatrimonial. São Paulo: Ed. Revista dos Tribunais, 2000.

Litan, R. E.; Winston, C. (eds.). Liability: perspectives and policy. Washington: The Brookings Institution Press, 1988.

Laïde, Z. A chegada do Homem-Presente ou da Nova Condição do Tempo. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 2000.

Lopez, T. A. Princípio da Precaução e Evolução da Responsabilidade Civil. São Paulo: Quatier Latin, 2010.

Lopucki, L. M. The Death of Liability. The Yale Law Journal, 1996.

Managi, S., Opaluck, J. J., Jin, D., Grigalunas, T. A. Environmental Regulations and Technological Change in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry: Rethinking the Porter Hypothesis. 2002.

Mercuro, N.; Medema, S. Economics and the Law: from Posner to Post-modernism. Princenton:

Princenton University Press, 1999. Millon, D. Theories of the Corporation. Duke Law Journal, 1990.

Mota, M. Princípio da Precaução: Uma Construção a Partir da Razoabilidade e da Proporcionalidade. In: Mota, M. (org.). Fundamentos Teóricos do Direito Ambiental. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2008.

Piana, V. (ed.). Innovative Economic Policies for Climate Change Mitigation. Economics Web Institute, 2009.

Pickering, H. A new era for the offshore oil and gas industry on the UKCS. Marine Policy,v. 23, n. 4-5, p. 329-346, 1999.

Posner, R. From the Oil Spill to the Financial Crisis, Why We don´t Plan for the Worst. 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/04/AR2010060402023.html >. Acesso em: 29 ago 2010.

Püschel, F. P. Funções e Princípios Justificadores da Responsabilidade Civil e o Art. 927, Parágrafo Único do Código Civil. Disponível em: <http://www.direitogv.com.br/AppData/Publication/FuncoesPrincipiosJustificadoresFlaviaPuschel.pdf>. Acesso em: 29 ago 2010.

Richards, A., Saiotti, P., Walsh, V. (eds.). Technological Collaboration: the dynamics of co-operation in industrial innovation. Chleton: Edward Elgar, 1996.

Ruckelshaus, W. D. Risk, Science, and Democracy. In: Glickman, T. S.; Gough, M. (eds.). Readings in Risk Resources. RFF PRESS, 1990.

Silva, C. O Princípio do Poluidor-Pagador: Da Eficiência Econômica à Realização da Justiça. In: MOTA, M. (org.). Fundamentos Teóricos do Direito Ambiental. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2008.

Smith, V. K. Advances in Applied Micro-Economics: Risks, Uncertainty and the Valuation of Benefits and Costs. JAI Press, 1987.

Starr, C. Social Benefit Versus Technological Risk. In: Glickman, T. S.; Gough, M. (eds.). Readings in Risk Resources. RFF PRESS, 1990.

Strutt, J. E., Sharp, J.V., Terry, E., Miles, R. Capability maturity models for offshore organisational management. Environment International, v. 32, p. 1094–110, 2006.

Sunstein, C. R. Riesgo y Razón : seguridad, ley y medioambiente. Buenos Aires: Katz, 2006.

Talmud, I. Corporate Social Capital and Liability: A conditional approach to three consequences of corportate social structure. In: Leenders, R. T. A. J.; Gabbay, S. M. Corporate social capital and liability. Springer, 1999.

Taylor, W. R. Economics of Natural Resource Damage Assessment: comments. 1993. Tombs, S. Corporate Crime and New Organizational Forms. In: Pearce, F.; Snider, L. (eds.). Corporate crime: contemporary debates. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1995.

Tombs, S.; White, D. Capital Fights Back: Risk, Regulation and Profit in the UK Offshore Oil Industry. Studies in Political Economy, v. 57, 1998.

Walker, G., Kogut, B., Shan, W. Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry

Network. In: Lesser, E. L. Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and applications. Elsevier, 2000.

Woolfson, C., Beck, M. Corporate social responsibility failures in the oil industry. New York: Baywood, 2005.